CoinDCX Rolls Out Secure Decentralized Custody System in Wake of WazirX Hack
According to a series of tweets, CoinDCX has disclosed new plans to hand over the custodian role to customers. The decision implies that users will have comprehensive access and control over their virtual asset holdings. Hence, they will make transactions with limited restrictions from the company. Relaying the new development on X, Sumit Gupta, the exchange’s co-founder, wrote: “This gives all our CoinDCX users unprecedented control over their assets. Users now have the option to move their crypto holdings from CoinDCX’s custody to a decentralized wallet on the blockchain and also transfer it back to CoinDCX custody as needed.” 1/ Happy to share that @CoinDCX has rolled out a global, first-of-its-kind decentralized custody feature! This gives all our CoinDCX users unprecedented control over their assets. Users now have an option to move their crypto holdings from CoinDCX’s custody to a decentralized… pic.twitter.com/55LqaNs8KR — Sumit Gupta (CoinDCX) (@smtgpt) October 30, 2024 Factors Driving the Switch in Custodian Role Explaining the exchange’s decision, Gupta highlighted the enhanced security advancements stemming from adopting decentralized custody. “With decentralized custody, users gain full ownership of their assets with enhanced transparency and security while enjoying all of CoinDCX’s features. This is a game-changer for crypto asset management, setting a new benchmark for secure, user-controlled custody,” the co-founder added. Meanwhile, aside from merely opting for a more secure framework for its users, the security breach incident involving WazirX was one of the main driving factors. Per reports, WazirX lost over 45% of the digital assets in their custody. The hijacked assets equated to over $230 million, which left 16 million users depressed and in sorrowful states. Surprisingly, the crime happened via a multi-sig wallet, initially deemed impermeable to online attacks. CoinDCX New Custody System Features The new blockchain wallet has unique features, distinguishing it from the native wallet. Instead of employing complex seed phrases, users are required to protect their funds using the multi-party structure and the two-factor authentication pin. The multi-party structure allows authorization only from the custodian and the Web3 company. In his exact wording, Gupta stated: “Traditional self-custody wallets can be tricky, with seed phrases and private keys to manage. With our Web3 Mode, we eliminate these headaches, replacing them with two-factor authentication (2FA) and multi-party computation (MPC) for a more secure, accessible experience.”
Hong Kong’s ZA Bank Launches Crypto Services Sandbox Trial
In a recent development, Hong Kong’s first and largest digital bank, ZA Bank, has launched a sandbox trial for its new virtual assets trading service. Per an October 29 press release, ZA Bank disclosed that the trial aims to meet the growing demand for crypto assets in Hong Kong. The bank added that, upon completion of the trial, it will begin preparations for a full launch, which it will achieve via its bank app. It envisions the move will benefit retail users by enabling them to enjoy access to the vast global crypto market. Growing Interest in Crypto Asset Reported Among Hong Kong Residents Notably, retail investors in Hong Kong are showing a strong interest in crypto assets. A recent market study reported crypto trading interest in about 75% of retail investors in Hong Kong. Among these retailers, 41% reported a preference for spot or futures crypto ETFs investment. 39% demonstrated a preference for locally licensed and regulated virtual assets platforms. Furthermore, the study also reported that portfolio diversification, the increased potential for higher short-term returns, and societal acceptance may influence retailers’ motivation to invest in crypto. Honk Kong’s ZA Bank Aims to Capitalize on Favourable Crypto Regulatory Framework Meanwhile, ZA Bank’s initiative aligns with Hong Kong’s broader vision to become Asia’s leading hub for digital assets. Consequently, ZA Bank appears to be positioning itself to capitalize on Hong Kong’s new crypto regulatory framework. The bank’s endgame remains to create a bank-related platform to attract users interested in trading virtual assets. In line with its expansion plan, Hong Zong’s government has revealed plans to expand its roster of licensed crypto trading platforms, aiming for additional digital asset exchanges by late 2024. Bringing additional platforms under official oversight will make crypto trading safer and more accessible within Hong Kong. Furthermore, the government also disclosed that it aims to introduce tax incentives for crypto investments by the end of the year.
Seven Highly Notable Forks in Cryptocurrency History
Forks in cryptocurrency are moments of both opportunity and conflict. While they can lead to innovation and new features, they also often result in heated disagreements among communities. Contrary to popular belief, not all forks result in a permanent split, but they do have a lasting impact on the blockchain ecosystem. Cryptocurrency forks have not only shaped the trajectory of various coins but have also highlighted the speed at which the market can change—sometimes dramatically, sometimes subtly. Let’s dive into the most notable forks in cryptocurrency history, explore the different types of forks, and understand their lasting impact on the crypto landscape. Recommended reading: Proof of History in Blockchain Technology Key Takeaways What Is a Cryptocurrency Fork? A cryptocurrency fork is when a developer adds updates and features to a blockchain code which leads to it splitting into two paths. Each of these paths becomes independent and forms new blockchains and coins, but remains connected to the original chain. The cause of a crypto fork can be unintentional or an upgrade to the blockchain’s rules. Types of Forks There are two types of crypto forks. Soft Fork A soft fork in crypto refers to a backward-compatible change to the blockchain’s protocol, where older nodes can still validate blocks under the new rules, though they may reject blocks that violate the older, less strict rules. Soft forks typically don’t result in a split of the blockchain, although temporary forks can occur during the upgrade process. No new cryptocurrency is created in a soft fork. A notable example is Bitcoin’s SegWit (Segregated Witness), which improved transaction efficiency without creating a new chain or coin. Hard Fork This occurs when changes to the blockchain protocol lead to the creation of new rules that are incompatible with the original chain. A hard fork typically results in a permanent split, where the new chain follows the updated protocol, and the original chain continues with the old rules. In some cases, a new cryptocurrency emerges from this split, while the original cryptocurrency remains. Nodes that wish to participate in the new chain must upgrade to the new protocol. Examples of hard forks include Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Bitcoin SV (BSV), Bitcoin Gold (BTG), and Ethereum Classic (ETC). Key Forks in Cryptocurrency History Some notable forks in cryptocurrency history include: Bitcoin Forks Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Bitcoin Cash (BCH), created in 2017, is a hard fork of Bitcoin. While it shares Bitcoin’s transaction history up until the fork, it operates on a separate blockchain. The main reason for this notable fork was Bitcoin’s scalability issue, as Bitcoin’s 1MB block size limit constrained the number of transactions that could be processed per block, leading to slower transaction times and higher fees during periods of congestion. The Bitcoin community was divided, with some advocating for larger block sizes to handle more transactions and others wanting to keep the block size the same to prioritize decentralization. As a result, Bitcoin Cash was created with an increased block size limit of 8MB, allowing more transactions per block, which aimed to reduce fees and alleviate network congestion. Bitcoin SV (BSV) Bitcoin SV (BSV) was created in 2018 through a hard fork from Bitcoin Cash (BCH), driven by a desire to return to what its proponents claim is the original vision of Bitcoin, as outlined by Satoshi Nakamoto. The split was fueled by controversies over scalability, governance, and the interpretation of Bitcoin’s purpose. BSV’s supporters, led by Craig Wright, a figure who controversially claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, and Calvin Ayre, a notable entrepreneur, argued that increasing the block size to 128MB would allow BSV to scale and fulfill Bitcoin’s potential as a global payment system. While BSV has made this increase, it continues to be a contentious force within the crypto community, with its interpretation of Satoshi’s vision being hotly debated. The “SV” in Bitcoin SV stands for “Satoshi’s Vision.” Bitcoin Gold (BTG) Bitcoin Gold (BTG) emerged from a hard fork of the original Bitcoin blockchain in 2017 with the goal of decentralizing Bitcoin mining. By implementing a new proof-of-work algorithm called Equihash, BTG sought to shift mining away from specialized ASIC hardware, which had concentrated mining power in the hands of a few large operators, and toward more accessible GPU-based mining. Led by Jack Liao, BTG aimed to return mining power to everyday users. The project also introduced robust replay protection to prevent transaction duplication across the Bitcoin and BTG networks, as well as a dynamic difficulty adjustment algorithm (DAA) to maintain network stability amid fluctuating mining power. While BTG aimed to democratize mining, its impact on achieving true decentralization remains a topic of debate. Recommended reading: Bitcoin vs Ethereum: Which Is The Better Store Of Value? Segregated Witness (SegWit) Segregated Witness (SegWit) is a landmark soft fork in cryptocurrency history that separates witness data (signatures and scripts) from the rest of the transaction data, addressing a vulnerability known as transaction malleability. This change in Bitcoin’s transaction format allowed more transactions to fit into each block, effectively reducing transaction size and lowering fees under certain conditions. By resolving technical barriers, SegWit also paved the way for scaling solutions like the Lightning Network. Proposed by Pieter Wuille in 2015, SegWit became active in August 2017 after contentious debate within the Bitcoin community and was formally introduced as Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 141. Ethereum Forks Ethereum Classic (ETC) Ethereum Classic (ETC), which is the continuation of the original Ethereum blockchain, emerged in 2016 following the infamous hack of the Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), which resulted in the theft of millions of dollars worth of ether. The Ethereum community was split into two camps: one group favored returning the stolen funds through a blockchain rollback, while the other insisted that the blockchain must remain immutable, adhering to the principle that “code is law.” A hard fork ensued, leading to a split in the blockchain. The majority supported the rollback, resulting in the new Ethereum (ETH), which continued to be developed by Vitalik Buterin and a
Top Ethereum Statistics Every Investor Should Know
Do you know that Ethereum is the foundation for countless decentralized applications (dApps) that offer innovative solutions in various fields, including finance, gaming, and social media? Ethereum is not just another digital asset, it is a cornerstone of innovation. Ethereum statistics are more than just numbers, they are the pulse of one of the most dynamic and influential blockchains in the world. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or a beginner, knowing about the key statistics of Ethereum can provide you with a competitive edge in making decisions. In this article, we will examine the top Ethereum statistics every investor should know with insights on how to trade digital assets with confidence. Read Also: Bitcoin vs Ethereum: Which Is The Better Store Of Value? Key Takeaways Ethereum Market Capitalization As of September 10, 2024, according to ycharts, Ethereum’s Market Cap was $292.33 billion. Current Market Cap In 2024, Bitcoin and Ethereum together accounted for over half of the entire crypto market, while newer coins struggled to keep up. For example, Polkadot (DOT), an altcoin launched in August 2020, quickly gained attention in 2021 as a potential rival to Ethereum’s blockchain. Just six months after its release, Polkadot’s value had already increased sixfold. However, by 2024, Ethereum’s dominant position in the market remained largely unchanged. Read Also: Top Crypto Trading Volume Statistics in 2025 Historical Growth and Key Milestones in Ethereum’s Market Cap Ethereum Market Cap vs. Bitcoin In 2024, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) continue to dominate the crypto market, commanding around 70% of the global market share despite competition from hundreds of other cryptocurrencies. With a market cap of $1.14 trillion, Bitcoin far outpaces Ethereum’s $292.33 billion, yet Ethereum remains the second-largest cryptocurrency, holding a market cap more than three times larger than any other crypto. Classified as large-cap assets, Bitcoin and Ethereum’s market leadership highlights their pivotal role in shaping the industry. Bitcoin is still the most well-known cryptocurrency, but Ethereum is catching up fast. Bitcoin has a fixed limit of 21 million coins that can ever be mined, meaning once all are mined, no more will be created. On the other hand, Ethereum doesn’t have a total cap on how many coins can exist, but only 18 million Ether can be mined each year. Because of this, Ethereum could eventually surpass Bitcoin. Impact of Market Cap on Investor Confidence and Market Stability A rising market cap often indicates growing confidence in the platform’s technology, potential, and future applications. Also, a declining market cap can signal uncertainty or concerns among investors. Ethereum Historical Price Trends Launch and Initial Price Ethereum was launched on July 30, 2015, by Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation. The initial price of Ethereum (ETH) during its launch was approximately $0.31. Initial Growth Ethereum’s price remained relatively low and stable, hovering around $1 to $2 for most of 2015. The Rise of Smart Contracts In 2016, the introduction of smart contracts led to increased interest, pushing the price to around $10 by mid-2016. The DAO Hack In June 2016, the DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) hack led to a loss of $50 million worth of ETH, causing the price to plummet from around $20 to $12. In response, the Ethereum community decided to implement a hard fork, which resulted in the creation of two separate blockchains: Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC). By December, Ethereum’s price had further dropped to $6. ICO Boom The rise of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) on the Ethereum platform in 2017 fueled massive demand for ETH. Ethereum’s price skyrocketed from around $10 in January 2017 to around $800 in December. In January 2018, ETH witnessed an all-time high of approximately $1,400. Market Correction After reaching its peak, the market corrected, and Ethereum’s price fell sharply, closing 2018 just under $100. Extended Bear Market Throughout 2018 and 2019, Ethereum, like most cryptocurrencies, experienced a prolonged bear market. The price fluctuated between $80 and $300, with little significant upward momentum. Building the Foundation Despite the low prices, Ethereum’s development continued, with progress on Ethereum 2.0 and the expansion of the DeFi (Decentralized Finance) ecosystem. DeFi Explosion In 2020, the rise of DeFi projects built on Ethereum drove demand for ETH. The price of Ethereum began to recover, reaching around $740 by the end of 2020. Institutional Interest Increased institutional interest in Ethereum as an asset class also contributed to the price recovery. New All-Time Highs Ethereum surged to new all-time highs in 2021, reaching over $4,000 in May, peaking at around $4,800 in November 2021, and closing at $3,600 in December 2021. NFT Craze The explosion of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) on the Ethereum network further fueled price increase. Network Congestion High gas fees and network congestion became significant issues, though they didn’t prevent Ethereum from reaching new heights. Global Economic Factors The global economic downturn and rising interest rates led to a correction in the crypto market. Ethereum’s price fell from its 2021 highs to around $1,000 to $1,200 by mid-2022. Transition to Ethereum 2.0 Anticipation for Ethereum 2.0 and the transition to Proof of Stake (PoS) provided some price stability, with ETH hovering around $1,100 to $1,600 by the end of 2022. Successful Merge The successful completion of “The Merge” in September 2022, transitioning Ethereum to PoS, had a positive impact on price. Renewed Bullish Sentiment Ethereum’s price climbed back up, reaching around $2,000 to $2,500 in 2023, driven by increased staking and reduced supply. Growth of Layer 2 Solutions The expansion of Layer 2 solutions like Optimism and Arbitrum contributed to Ethereum’s scalability, supporting price growth. Current Price Trends As of 2024, Ethereum’s price continues to show resilience, trading in the range of $2,200 to $4,000. According to Forbes, by the end of 2024, ETH will touch $5,000. By 2025, Ethereum is expected to reach a maximum level of $6,500, with a minimum of $4,500 and an average of $5,500. By 2030, it is expected that it may reach a maximum of $20,500. Impact of Ethereum 2.0 The full implementation